Your markers in, advice out — every line traceable to a paper
Enter your blood pressure, blood panel and habits. Longevity Pro turns them into an anti-aging estimate with diet and lifestyle suggestions, and every suggestion links back to the claim, the paper and the on-chain record it came from. It is built but not open yet — try the input below to see how much verified evidence the graph holds for your markers today.
Not a diagnosis, and not a replacement for a doctor.
Fill in what you know — any field is optional
These are the real fields the service takes. Reports are not open yet, so you will not get a score — you will see how much verified evidence the graph holds for the markers you fill in. Nothing you type leaves this page: there is no request, and nothing is saved.
— verified claims. We are not selling this under 5,000.
The service exists. The input above is its real input model, and the evidence counts are the real retrieval logic run against the real graph. That result is the reason you cannot buy it yet. A report picks its best 24 claims out of a 100-claim candidate pool, and that is only enough to answer one person with one set of markers. A graph that can answer anyone needs to be far thicker. We put the number at 5,000 verified claims.
Anyone can write to the chain, so being on-chain does not make a claim usable. Each one is checked against public rules: the paper it cites must exist, the paper itself must be about aging, and both ends of the claim must appear in it. Claims that fail stay on-chain — they cannot be deleted — and are simply not counted. Rewards already paid stand: these rules were set on 21 September, after those claims were rewarded, and since then miners are handed papers that meet them before they start. Verification data is unavailable right now.
retrieval_window_size100bindingfinal_evidence_size24min_refs_per_recommendation2bindingThree separate limits in the service, not one derived from another — 24 is not five factors times two references. The two marked binding are the ones that decide whether the report is worth reading.
Every recommendation needs at least 2 independent references. No factor comes close to filling a 100-claim retrieval window. Selling a report on this would mean charging for a single citation dressed as a review.
Read live from the same keyword buckets the service itself uses, matched against the claim itself — not against the one-line summary the miner's model writes, which can mention topics the paper does not. Most verified claims are about aging in general rather than one of the five markers a personal report is built on. — claims are also anchored on Ethereum; the rest go on-chain at 00:30 UTC the night after they are submitted.
Real claims, verified — and far too few of them
A sample of verified claims for the factors that have any. Each opens on the block explorer and on Europe PMC. The line under each claim is a summary written by the miner's model; the paper is the source.
senolytics selectively eliminate senescent cells, targeting aging mechanism
telomere shortening triggers replicative senescence, a key aging mechanism relevant to longevity.
resveratrol increases enos activity, relevant to cardiovascular health and aging-related inflammation
$15 of $CXS, half of it burned
The treasury half funds the daily mining pool, so whoever buys a report is paying the miners whose claims it was built from. The split is already fixed in the service — it is not a number we will announce later and then revise.
More verified claims, and deeper ones
Not a launch date — 5,000 verified claims, the same line as everywhere else on this site. The numbers on this page are read from the same graph miners write to, so they move when people mine and not otherwise.
Nothing on this page is a projection except the miner table above, and it says what it assumes. Every claim shown was submitted by a miner, recorded on-chain and passed the public check, and the shortfall is measured rather than estimated. When it closes, this page will say so.